Re: [ITP] znc 1.6.0

[David Stacey <drstacey at tiscali dot co dot uk>]

On 21/07/2015 08:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 20 19:58, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > > > Well, in that case 1.6 works fine. When 1.7.0 will be released, the
> > > > filename will be changed to cygznc-1.7.dll.
> Assuming 1.7 does not break the ABI.  The problem here is that modules
> built for 1.6 won't run on 1.7, even if the ABI hasn't changed, because
> these modules won't find the DLL anymore.  In this case your update
> to a newer package would break self-built modules for no good reason.

I've had a busy day and I'm a little tired, so I'm probably about to 
make a fool of myself on a public mailing list. Never mind :-) Three 
points on the znc package:

  - Unless I've missed something, all this talk of DLL naming is a 
little academic at the moment, as there is no 'dll.a' file to actually 
link against.

  - Has anyone tried building this in Cygwin? I tried rebuilding the 
1.6.0-2 release, and couldn't get it to compile without hacking the 
'Makefile.in' files. Even if you generate a 'dll.a', the linker 
arguments are in the wrong order. This doesn't matter in Linux, but it 
/does/ matter in Cygwin. Does this only build if cross-compiled out of 
Fedora?

  - Forgive me for being pedantic, but who gave this a GTG? I couldn't 
find one on this thread, and yet the package is up on the mirrors.

Let's hope I've missed something really obvious - apologies for any 
late-night stupidity.

Dave.