This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release

On 8/13/2014 10:32 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 13:44 +0800, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thank both of you for the suggestion.  I agree _s isn't appropriate here,
>> and searched and replaced it with _n in the attached patch.  If anyone
>> thinks _n isn't clear enough I suggest we just use _nano here, since the
>> word is used elsewhere in both file name and configuration option name.
>> Is it OK for you guys?
>> Thanks,
>> bin
> I am happy with _n or _nano.
I agree with this. 

_p is profiling.
_g is sometimes used for debug versions.
_s (IMO) would likely be a normal build but with -Os variant.

Using _n or _nano and adding -Os would tweak
the build as far as it could be tweaked for size.
I assume that's the intent.

> Steve Ellcey

Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]