This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.28 status.

From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:37:32 -0400
Subject: Re: glibc 2.28 status.
References: <5fee6dec-3e32-7e34-f2e8-c8e9a64134b2@redhat.com> <fb53a597-5050-3f73-03c4-bb317a139078@linaro.org> <00d220fc-281e-49aa-d0fb-f19bfd693017@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807232231180.7039@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 07/23/2018 06:31 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> 
>> Joseph,
>>
>> Likewise. Have you reviewed the content of the patches and agree
>> the implementation is ready?
> 
> I have not reviewed the content of the patches.

Do you have any concern with the patches?

Would you object their inclusion in 2.28 if Adhemerval and Florian agree
the patches are ready?

I'm consciously trying to push this feature because it's been ready for
a while and would offer good value to our users.

Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Joseph Myers

References:
- glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]