newlib-2_2_0 tag missing?

Freddie Chopin freddie_chopin@op.pl
Tue Mar 24 12:52:00 GMT 2015


On 03/24/2015 11:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 23 19:33, Mike Stump wrote:
>> Should 183c67027c75ccc0f5b4953ce65a85eaa710e826 be tagged with newlib-2_2_0?
>>
>> I pulled down from the git repo and didn’t see a tag for newlib-2_2_0.
> Sure you pulled from the right repo?  There's no SHA1 ID
> 183c67027c75ccc0f5b4953ce65a85eaa710e826 in the newlib-cygwin.git repo
> afaics.
>
> If anything, this should be 0615b4bb5f38a738377d4856aed167f0ab6aa52d.

It seems that the "right" repo doesn't have this tag either. Moreover - 
tag for 2.1.0 looks more like some strange merge commit for 2.2.0.

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=38b85aed54f123088f578c98ead9474c3237b913

Regards,
FCh



More information about the Newlib mailing list