newlib-2_2_0 tag missing?

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Mar 24 13:27, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 11:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 23 19:33, Mike Stump wrote:
> >>Should 183c67027c75ccc0f5b4953ce65a85eaa710e826 be tagged with newlib-2_2_0?
> >>
> >>I pulled down from the git repo and didn’t see a tag for newlib-2_2_0.
> >Sure you pulled from the right repo?  There's no SHA1 ID
> >183c67027c75ccc0f5b4953ce65a85eaa710e826 in the newlib-cygwin.git repo
> >afaics.
> >
> >If anything, this should be 0615b4bb5f38a738377d4856aed167f0ab6aa52d.
> 
> It seems that the "right" repo doesn't have this tag either.

That was the SHA1 sum and it points to the last change for 2.2.0:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=0615b4bb5f38a738377d4856aed167f0ab6aa52d

> Moreover - tag
> for 2.1.0 looks more like some strange merge commit for 2.2.0.
> 
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=38b85aed54f123088f578c98ead9474c3237b913

Ok, I'm not that familiar with git yet, so I don't grok where the
newlib-2_1_0 commit comes from, but I see a newlib-2_2_0 tag (or branch,
whatever) in the repo which appears to point to the right thing, no?

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/newlib-2_2_0


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20150324/b76ceb3c/attachment.sig>