[PATCH v3] add kexec_load() syscall

[Roland McGrath]

> So, what do others think? Should maximilian continue to clean up this 
> and get it integrated - or should we reject this because of the few users?

We can collect other opinions, but I think we should defer the actual
decision until after 2.16 (which for now is not materially distinguishable
from deciding to reject it).  If the clean-up involves cleaning up the
header situation as I suggested, that will take somewhat longer to resolve
since it is a kernel dependency.


Thanks,
Roland