[PATCH v3] add kexec_load() syscall

[maximilian attems]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:49:04PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > So, what do others think? Should maximilian continue to clean up this 
> > and get it integrated - or should we reject this because of the few users?
> 
> We can collect other opinions, but I think we should defer the actual
> decision until after 2.16 (which for now is not materially distinguishable
> from deciding to reject it).  If the clean-up involves cleaning up the
> header situation as I suggested, that will take somewhat longer to resolve
> since it is a kernel dependency.

I'll be cleaning up the linux header, but can't promise a schedule of course.

-- 
maks