[PATCH v3] add kexec_load() syscall
Andreas Jaeger
aj@suse.com
Wed May 23 20:49:00 GMT 2012
On 05/23/2012 06:34 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> Motivation is to axe the syscall maze in kexec-tools itself and
>> > have this syscall supported in glibc for installers or other
>> > interested projects (kexecboot, ..).
> I'm not really convinced this is worthwhile. Calling 'syscall'
> seems quite sufficient for such arcane and rarely-used calls.
So, what do others think? Should maximilian continue to clean up this
and get it integrated - or should we reject this because of the few users?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list