MI-related testsuite regressions

[Nick Roberts]

Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:08:22AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
 > > If thats the case, shouldn't the code read:
 > > 
 ...

 > > 
 > > as it stands the mi-*.exp don't test mi3.
 > 
 > Probably, but I don't see much point in changing that until we have
 > some content for mi3.


This could equally be said for having separate tests mi-*.exp and mi2-*.exp.

Nick