MI-related testsuite regressions
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Mon Jun 27 14:31:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:08:22AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> If thats the case, shouldn't the code read:
>
> interp_add (interp_new (INTERP_MI, NULL, mi_out_new (3), &procs));
>
> and
>
> if (current_interp_named_p (INTERP_MI1))
> deprecated_command_loop_hook = mi1_command_loop;
> else if (current_interp_named_p (INTERP_MI2))
> deprecated_command_loop_hook = mi2_command_loop;
> else if (current_interp_named_p (INTERP_MI3))
> deprecated_command_loop_hook = mi3_command_loop;
> else
> deprecated_command_loop_hook = mi3_command_loop;
>
>
> as it stands the mi-*.exp don't test mi3.
Probably, but I don't see much point in changing that until we have
some content for mi3.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
More information about the Gdb
mailing list