MI-related testsuite regressions

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:54:27AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
>  > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:08:22AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
>  > > If thats the case, shouldn't the code read:
>  > > 
>  ...
> 
>  > > 
>  > > as it stands the mi-*.exp don't test mi3.
>  > 
>  > Probably, but I don't see much point in changing that until we have
>  > some content for mi3.
> 
> 
> This could equally be said for having separate tests mi-*.exp and mi2-*.exp.

It ensures that we don't develop unacceptable content in the existing
mi2 without noticing, as far as I'm concerned.

The existance of mi2-* maps to the fact that the protocol was released.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC