[ECOS] Vr4131 porting issues
Nick Garnett
nickg@ecoscentric.com
Tue Mar 18 20:16:00 GMT 2003
Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch> writes:
> > The first thing to note is that the vr4300 targets were all compiled
> > with a special version of the compiler, the mips64vr4300-elf
> > variant. The default eCos configuration assumes that compiler and GDB
> > to work properly.
> >
> > I cannot recall now whether this was a build option for the
> > public version, or was a Cygnus/Red Hat internal target that was
> > shipped to NEC specifically for their customers.
>
> Here is what the toolchain shipped to Ascom says. Does this help?
>
> mips64vr4100el-elf-gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/local/pkg/plcuts/H686-mips64vr4100el-elf-1.5.2/lib/gcc-lib/mips64vr4100el-elf/2.96-ascom-011012/specs
> gcc version 2.96-ascom-011012
>
> It's had some work done to it for a minor silicon bug. I don't think
> the work got put into the public sources because of NDA issues with
> NEC or something. From what i've been told, the actual chance of the
> bug causing problems is slim, so i don't think its that important.
>
That's almost certainly a custom-made version. I don't know how much
of that code made it back into the public GCC, though.
Jurica, maybe you should try using a more recent GCC version, 3.2.1
say, plus the matching binutils and gdb and see if the
mips64vr4100el-elf target works for you.
--
Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss
mailing list