[PATCH] ld: xfail riscv64be-*-* for ld-scripts/empty-address-2 tests.
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Thu Jan 7 11:58:00 GMT 2021
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:19:20PM +0800, Nelson Chu wrote:
> XPASS: ld-elf/compressed1d
>
> I think the RISC-V big-endian support won't break the compress rules,
> just break the compressed1d test by accident. Since the sizes of
> compressed and uncompressed .debug_aranges are the same for the
> riscv[32|64]be, but different for the little endian targets... Jim
> already had written an alternative test compressed1d-alt. Therefore,
> should we need to only xfail the riscv "little endian" targets for
> ld-elf/compressed1d, but allow the big endian passes?
Yes, that sounds like the right thing to do.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils
mailing list