[PATCH] ld: xfail riscv64be-*-* for ld-scripts/empty-address-2 tests.
Nelson Chu
nelson.chu@sifive.com
Thu Jan 7 07:19:20 GMT 2021
Hi Alan,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:36:54AM -0800, Nelson Chu wrote:
> > -#xfail: frv-*-*linux* riscv64-*-* tic54x-*-*
> > +#xfail: frv-*-*linux* riscv64-*-* riscv64be-*-* tic54x-*-*
>
> Not that it matters very much, but you could write riscv64*-*-*
> instead of the two riscv entries.
Thanks, these look better, I have updated them and committed.
Besides, riscv[32|64]be also get the following xpass,
XPASS: ld-elf/compressed1d
I think the RISC-V big-endian support won't break the compress rules,
just break the compressed1d test by accident. Since the sizes of
compressed and uncompressed .debug_aranges are the same for the
riscv[32|64]be, but different for the little endian targets... Jim
already had written an alternative test compressed1d-alt. Therefore,
should we need to only xfail the riscv "little endian" targets for
ld-elf/compressed1d, but allow the big endian passes?
Thanks
Nelson
More information about the Binutils
mailing list