[PATCH] ld: xfail riscv64be-*-* for ld-scripts/empty-address-2 tests.

[Nelson Chu]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:58 PM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:19:20PM +0800, Nelson Chu wrote:
> > XPASS: ld-elf/compressed1d
> >
> > I think the RISC-V big-endian support won't break the compress rules,
> > just break the compressed1d test by accident.  Since the sizes of
> > compressed and uncompressed .debug_aranges are the same for the
> > riscv[32|64]be, but different for the little endian targets...  Jim
> > already had written an alternative test compressed1d-alt.  Therefore,
> > should we need to only xfail the riscv "little endian" targets for
> > ld-elf/compressed1d, but allow the big endian passes?
>
> Yes, that sounds like the right thing to do.

Thanks!  I have sent the patch that tries to only xfail the riscv
little endian targets, but allow other targets to pass, including
riscv big endian targets.

Thanks
Nelson