Vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb repo
Mike Frysinger
vapier@gentoo.org
Tue Jun 28 03:52:00 GMT 2016
On 27 Jun 2016 20:10, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 6/27/16 2:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > did we decide anything ? seems like we didn't.
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-04/msg00068.html
> >
> > i'm debating whether to move Gentoo's branches over like i do
> > already for glibc:
> > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=heads
>
> I can't find the post, but we did come to a consensus that vendor
> and personal branches should come under the .../users/<vendor|user>/
> directory.
sounds good. i'll see about moving Gentoo's binutils & my gdb changes up.
> Currently, IBM and ARM have vendor branches and there are quite a
> few personal branches too:
i saw, but it wasn't clear to me whether it was one-off or "sanctioned".
thanks!
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20160628/2b95309c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list