2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!

Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsepius@rtems.org
Fri Apr 27 07:05:00 GMT 2012

On 04/27/2012 05:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 07:26 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 04/26/2012 07:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> On 04/26/2012 11:02 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> On 04/26/2012 03:29 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>>> If anyone has patches to backport, please speak up.
>>>> These are the 2 patches, I would like to see applied for RTEMS, Joel
>>>> mentioned before.
>>>> Both are raw backports from trunk.
>>>> *-1.diff is the coldfire patch.
>>>> *-2.diff addresses build-issues.
>>>> Without it, binutils-2.22 fails to build for me on mingw-w64 hosts.
>>> And PR13991 which I assume isn't in your build set yet because
>>> it is new. :)
>> Correct. I actually haven't looked into this patch, yet.
>> Unless somebody else is faster and if my time permits, I'll try to
>> cutting a patch, tomorrow and submit it here, if it has seen at least
>> some preliminary testing.
> Well, the size and intrusiveness of the resulting patch lets me hesitate
> from applying it and to at least stop for now.

Alan sent me a hint off-list, which had let the patch collapse into the 
patch below.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rtems-binutils-pr13991.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2847 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20120427/dcd26c92/attachment.bin>

More information about the Binutils mailing list