Binutuls is broken now.

[DJ Delorie]

> > Given what we know, if my patch is not acceptable to everyone, may I
> > suggest we revert the patch:
> > 
> > 2001-06-15  Hans-Peter Nilsson  <hp@axis.com>
> > 
> >         * ldlang.c (lang_check): Emit fatal error if relocatable link
> >         between different object flavours.
> > 
> > We can find some better ways to deal with it later.
> 
> I disagree.  That would *again* SEGV as I described when the
> patch was submitted.  I think your follow-up-patch would be much
> better.

In general, if a patch is checked in that causes problems, the *first*
thing you do is revert the patch.  Then, after reviewing the problem
and coming up with a solution that works better, you check in the new
patch - which may include all or parts of the old patch.

Especially true in this case, where the patch does not fix any broken
functionality, but does break previously working functionality.

This is the only way to stop the code from growing worse and worse
with time.