Re: [PATCH] Add typedef of stack_t for Cygwin

[Jon TURNEY <jon dot turney at dronecode dot org dot uk>]

On 01/04/2015 12:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 31 18:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On 3/31/2015 6:20 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> > > On 31/03/2015 16:47, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > > Why can't you move the definition that is there for RTEMS and use
> > > > it for both Cygwin and RTEMS? We have exactly the same definition
> > > > only a few lines above.
> > > >
> > > > There is no point in duplicating this and when Cygwin and RTEMS
> > > > can use exactly the same code, I am personally much happier.
> > > Ok.  Attached patch is revised as you suggest.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry I have no way to test this with RTEMS.
> > It's OK. I think you would actually have to build tools, then RTEMS,
> > then the new TCP/IP stack as an add-on package since it is an external
> > package.
> >
> > The patch looks OK to me.
>
> Yes, it's fine.  We can also go the full way and remove any RTEMS
> and Cygwin macro check for this as Sebastian proposes.
I committed this with the guards removed.