This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the newlib project.
RE: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf
- From: "Thomas Preud'homme" <thomas dot preudhomme at arm dot com>
- To: "'Joern Rennecke'" <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
- Cc: "GCC" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Joerg Wunsch" <joerg_wunsch at uriah dot heep dot sax dot de>, <avr-libc-dev at nongnu dot org>, "Andrew Burgess" <andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com>, <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:30:45 +0800
- Subject: RE: selective linking of floating point support for *printf / *scanf
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMqJFCpWKXVmmc-YLKf9XO6H8C_YnTEcgzkJAidE21MirJbi-w at mail dot gmail dot com> <001401cfc0f9$bdc5cbc0$39516340$ at arm dot com> <CAMqJFCrEOgavwvW25vO=S-+0TZ_xOnDa0Ex-Ff4XG329K5WE9g at mail dot gmail dot com> <001901cfc1c4$d0678630$71369290$ at arm dot com> <CAMqJFCoFC8sVRQB3+v4dzSVc5LLs9cycjm621FmM34gGHRWFng at mail dot gmail dot com> <000001cfc1e3$7f1a22f0$7d4e68d0$ at arm dot com> <CAMqJFCo1EA8TLVsv=r7gW-udiH6pqBKVuQUvHeGcFDqrnMo_EQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
> From: Joern Rennecke [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:54 PM
> Well, my goal was to have the selection be automatic for most use cases.
> That you can do a manual selection by providing -u / -l arguments to the
> linker is pretty much a given.
> Hmm, instead of needing -u you could make gcc spit out definitions of a
> local symbol to the trigger symbol in question (forcing a non-weak
> using SET_ASM_OP (assuming it's defined). But you'd still be left with the
> extra call overhead, increasing code size no matter if float is needed or not.
That's indeed the approach I took in my own patch.
> Yes. I'll have to adjust the avr hook that it'll leave the v*printf /
> v*scanf functions
> alone - at least by default / for ISO C behaviour - but it'll give me
> an easy way
> to add a switch to tweak the behaviour.
> Or maybe we can use a -f option to select the v*printf / v*scanf default and
> put the a stdio_altname__int_ target hook in targhooks.c, to be shared by all
> configs that want an __int_ prefix.
Are you aware of other C libraries that would benefit from such a default (newlib
Right now I'm having trouble to define stdio_altname in newlib-c.c since this would
require it to be a C target hook but such a hook cannot be called from middle end.
Did I mis(understood|s) something?
> FWIW, to safely shift the symbol into the implementation namespace you
> need a prefix that starts with two underbars or one underbar and a
> capital letter.
> Or use some funny non-standard character in the symbol - but that's asking
> more portability issues.
> For references made automatically by gcc, it's a good idea not to impinge on
> the application namespace.
I'll consider about renaming the symbol but we've been using this one for
some time in our toolchain so it might not be possible to change.
> An application might use printf from <stdio.h>, but define its own functions
> iprintf, printf_float and _printf_float.
> Therefore, it's a good idea to put the definition of newlib's iprintf
> in a separate
> file from __int_printf. Having essentialy the same contents, but
> defining a different
> symbol, and let the linker match them up to the definition.
I'm confused here. Why would we have a __int_printf? Right now we only
have iprintf as an alias to printf, _printf_float being a weakly defined function
called from printf for the float support.