This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sourceware.org
mailing list for the newlib project.
RE: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release
- From: "Bin Cheng" <bin dot cheng at arm dot com>
- To: "Bin Cheng" <Bin dot Cheng at arm dot com>, <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:36:46 +0800
- Subject: RE: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <001e01cfb600$ce404f10$6ac0ed30$ at arm dot com> <53EA3269 dot 1080304 at LGSInnovations dot com> <1407866624 dot 2601 dot 77 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <000001cfb6b9$b6fa3690$24eea3b0$ at arm dot com> <20140813115827 dot GH21106 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <165930362 dot 28789080 dot 1407948487418 dot JavaMail dot zimbra at redhat dot com> <000a01cfb78d$cfdd1cc0$6f975640$ at arm dot com> <20140814080008 dot GA17310 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <001f01cfb79a$93680c70$ba382550$ at arm dot com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Bin Cheng
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:35 PM
> To: newlib@sourceware.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib
> library in one tool-chain release
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:00 PM
> > To: newlib@sourceware.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version
> > of newlib library in one tool-chain release
> >
> > Hi Bin,
> >
> > On Aug 14 15:03, Bin Cheng wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> > > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 12:48 AM
> > > > To: newlib@sourceware.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two
> > > > version of newlib I think _nano is better since the specs file is
> > > > called called nano.specs and it is a new invention no one will be
> > > > familiar with yet. The nano version of the library has some
> > > > caveats that the end-user needs to understand so make it easier
> > > > for them to find the
> > documentation and understand what it is.
> > > >
> > > Thanks for the comments.
> > > Here comes the patch using lib*_nana.a, please review.
> >
> > You accidentally missed to attach the patch.
> >
> Sorry about that. The patch can be simply replaced by sed.
I mean the change is trivial. But I DID forgot to include it.
Thanks,
bin
>
> Thanks,
> bin
> >
> > Corinna
> >
> > --
> > Corinna Vinschen
> > Cygwin Maintainer
> > Red Hat