Re: feature macros in stdlib.h

[Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>]

On Jan 13 09:26, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> On 1/13/2014 3:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 13 08:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> Hello Joel,
> >>
> >> I would use the FreeBSD mechanism for this, e.g.
> > I agree.  After the last years patches to cdefs.h, we're good to use the
> > visibility macros throughout, rathe than just __STRICT_ANSI__ and
> > _POSIX_SOURCE.
> Just to follow up, the issue seems to be that  g++ defines
> __STRICT_ANSI__ when you
> use -std=XXX in some cases. I am investigating porting Qt and thus lots
> of C++ which
> expects POSIX files.
> 
> I have hacked on my installed headers and it looks like at least a half
> dozen files
> require touching. If a file gets touched, I would personally like to do
> it top to bottom
> and not restrict fixing just the method Qt needs.
> 
> It would be helpful to have some translation advice on the Open Group
> commentary and headers. Or should I just look at FreeBSD and use the
> same thing?

Sure.  There's nothing wrong taking FreeBSD as role model I think.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat

Attachment: pgptpFm_7AwHf.pgp
Description: PGP signature