This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Helmut Grohne <helmut at subdivi dot de>, debian-glibc at lists dot debian dot org, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv at altlinux dot org>, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge at gentoo dot org>, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gentoo dot org>, Khem Raj <raj dot khem at gmail dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu dot com>, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Daniel Schepler <schepler at debian dot org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:50:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: Propose requiring Python 3.4 or later for building glibc.
- References: <email@example.com> <20181022095125.GA15764@aurel32.net> <20181022141525.GA16023@alf.mars> <alpine.DEB.firstname.lastname@example.org> <alpine.DEB.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <alpine.DEB.email@example.com>
On 10/24/18 4:37 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> Carlos, do you agree we have consensus on the Python 3.4 requirement (the
>>> patch <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-10/msg00215.html> to add
>>> that requirement still needs to be reviewed)?
>> I agree we have consensus and that the distribution maintainer are
>> sufficiently aware of the change that they will have time to adjust
>> before the release on February 1st.
> Thanks. I've now committed the patch to use gen-libm-test.py to generate
> the ulps table for the manual (which the above referenced patch builds
I'm glad to see this move forward. Thank you very much for doing this