This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin dot de>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:15:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1a57be83-3349-5450-ee4f-d2a33569a728@mellanox.com> <d6c8e425-a6b6-6594-05e3-965536f06da3@physik.fu-berlin.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712012159490.15078@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <995aac59-2f9d-2a6a-2b5c-b827410ad295@physik.fu-berlin.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311732001.23883@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On 01/31/2018 06:37 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> The 2.27 release is due out tomorrow. So far, no test results for tile
> have been posted at <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.27> - and
> the same applies to sh and ia64, which also had some interest in them
> expressed in this thread. Are you, or other people you're working with
> who have interest in those architectures, working on having results for
> those architectures for 2.27 for the wiki page (regenerating libm test
> ulps first and getting that regeneration checked in if there would
> otherwise be tests failing only because of lack of updated ulps)?
I don't have access to tile hardware at the moment, but sh4 and ia64.
Adhemerval has access to the sparc64, sh4 and ia64 boxes as well and
he said he would be working on the ia64 stuff.
If he doesn't run the testsuite on these architectures, I can do that
later next week.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913