This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Tests for res_init


On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:43 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 06/02/2017 10:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 05/18/2017 10:05 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>>>>> Why not just have a tst-resolv-res_init.c and
>>>>> tst-resolv-res_init-thread.c?  That's how a lot of the other similar
>>>>> kinds of tests are rewritten.  I don't have a very strong opinion on
>>>>> this though, you can choose the color of your shed :)
>>>>
>>>> I do it this way so that I can use #if instead of #ifdef, following the
>>>> current guidelines to trigger -Wundef warnings on typos.
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to push this without the tests expecting incorrect results.
>>>>
>>>
>>> On Fedora 25/x86-64, I got
>>>
>>> [hjl@gnu-6 build-x86_64-linux]$ cat resolv/tst-resolv-res_init.out
>>> Timed out: killed the child process
>>> [hjl@gnu-6 build-x86_64-linux]$ cat resolv/tst-resolv-res_init-thread.out
>>> Timed out: killed the child process
>>> [hjl@gnu-6 build-x86_64-linux]$
>>
>> I see that too, with 4.11.3-200.fc25.x86_64.  What's your kernel version?
>>
>> I don't see the delay with 4.10.17-100.fc24.x86_64.  There, the poll
>> system calls return immediately.  I wonder if it's some sort of
>> regression in network namespaces.
>
> Yes, I am also running 4.11.3-200.fc25.x86_64.
>

I booted 4.10.16-200.fc25.x86_64 and the test passed.  Any ideas?

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]