This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 08 Jun 2016 16:22, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 06/08/2016 03:43 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 15:33 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> How did we get a temporary value without knowing who to contact? :} > > > > The glibc elf/elf.h file says how to construct one, and rth knows > > l33t-speak! :) > > > > /* If it is necessary to assign new unofficial EM_* values, > > please > > pick large random numbers (0x8523, 0xa7f2, etc.) ... */ > > > > #define EM_BPF 0xeb9f > > > > Personally I like rth's suggestion best. > > But an "official" number would be fine too of course. > > If it's an unofficial EM_* value, why check it into glibc upstream? > > Lets just wait until we get the final value and avoid any problems? agreed ... i think we're past the point in general where glibc needs to get early values in order to make progress. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |