This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 04:48:15PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Yes, but these options if overwritten do not cause resolving to fail. If > the DNSSEC settings are lost it means that every application that > depends on that will fail. That's a significant difference. Isn't that the feature? > It may have been that resolv.conf's semantics are known to too many > people to change now. Agreed, but that does not preclude addition of an option in a manner that does not break backward compatibility. In fact, adding another configuration file just for DNSSEC is just messy. Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgpCsz5k29BR1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |