This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fixes for 2.15.1

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, carlos at systemhalted dot org
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:51:44 -0700
Subject: Re: Fixes for 2.15.1
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202231805150.31497@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <201202231535.38986.vapier@gentoo.org>

On 02/23/2012 01:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:

how do we feel about posting reverts to branches when master isn't fixed ?  i'm
thinking of this which a bunch of distros are carrying:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-01/msg00002.html
the answer is probably "no" ...

Actually, I doubt the distros are carrying that change.

The debian based distros are using the C versions of those routines because the x86/x86_64 versions have caused numerous problems over time.

Fedora/RHEL have reverted the specific commit for handling EAGAIN. It's caused more problems than it fixed.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fixes for 2.15.1
  - From: David Miller

References:
- Fixes for 2.15.1
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Fixes for 2.15.1
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]