This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fixes for 2.15.1

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, carlos at systemhalted dot org
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Fixes for 2.15.1
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202231805150.31497@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><201202231535.38986.vapier@gentoo.org>

> how do we feel about posting reverts to branches when master isn't fixed ?  i'm 
> thinking of this which a bunch of distros are carrying:
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-01/msg00002.html
> the answer is probably "no" ...

In general I don't think it would be entirely ruled out.  But it certainly
goes against the grain.  I think we should have someone put significant
effort into figuring out the problem and resolving it for the trunk before
considering a resolution for 2.15.


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- Fixes for 2.15.1
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Fixes for 2.15.1
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]