This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: mips64 n32 and n64 suport in elf/
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>, aj at suse dot de
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 18 Mar 2003 04:24:38 -0300
- Subject: Re: mips64 n32 and n64 suport in elf/
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200303140507.h2E57b009902@magilla.sf.frob.com><orisumfpen.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Mar 14, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com> wrote:
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/dl-librecon.h: New file.
> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n64/dl-librecon.h: New file.
> * elf/rtld.c (process_envvars): Handle
> EXTRA_LD_PROCESS_ENVVARS_DECLS, EXTRA_LD_LEN14_ENVVARS and
> EXTRA_LD_AFTER_PROCESS_ENVVARS.
Andreas, are the mips-specific changes ok? I'm thinking I could
arrange to have rtld.c patched by mips-specific configury magic, if
Uli stands against these minor, clean changes in rtld.c. Of course,
he'd be trading minor cleanliness in rtld.c for major gunk in
mips-specific code, but if he keeps opposing the port on the basis of
prejudice, I think we may have to bite the bullet and do it the ugly
way. Which also means that whenever the patch stops applying
correctly, we'll have to update it. This sucks, but it's not like
we're not used to updating patch files such that they apply in RPM
sources anyway :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva at {redhat dot com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva at {lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer