This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: mips64 n32 and n64 suport in elf/
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com> writes:
> On Mar 14, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com> wrote:
>> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/dl-librecon.h: New file.
>> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n64/dl-librecon.h: New file.
>> * elf/rtld.c (process_envvars): Handle
>> EXTRA_LD_PROCESS_ENVVARS_DECLS, EXTRA_LD_LEN14_ENVVARS and
> Andreas, are the mips-specific changes ok? I'm thinking I could
One without the other does not make sense IMO. Please come up with a
> arrange to have rtld.c patched by mips-specific configury magic, if
> Uli stands against these minor, clean changes in rtld.c. Of course,
> he'd be trading minor cleanliness in rtld.c for major gunk in
> mips-specific code, but if he keeps opposing the port on the basis of
> prejudice, I think we may have to bite the bullet and do it the ugly
> way. Which also means that whenever the patch stops applying
> correctly, we'll have to update it. This sucks, but it's not like
> we're not used to updating patch files such that they apply in RPM
> sources anyway :-)
SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
private aj at arthur dot inka dot de