This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Fix documentation for Type.template_argument.
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Justin Lebar <jlebar at google dot com>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:44:15 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix documentation for Type.template_argument.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1403649524-10769-1-git-send-email-jlebar at google dot com> <CAMuNMfouo1ZX5GNx2T5Sk0HEb9AiY7spYgur-cXZeJCeduMB3g at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140707144250 dot GE6038 at adacore dot com> <83wqbpchgz dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAMuNMfp6A+cbdeWgKnN6aw55qxgpDKX==8wJNGKmUjyaXKeaZA at mail dot gmail dot com> <83tx6tcbdx dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CADPb22Tf4m-1gsNY2Qr-evEuNFYmgjyf+HNfkMBKKS6MXuniWg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMuNMfp79fC-kcY6rix2LO8Yw0yKnzzyFK94GyqoWgwg8_UYgg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22QhOYDxhhL3Ep4F+Qj2V1dqR5aX2ivUzr8JG2o6Zo96Vg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> Yeah, it's good to go.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar@google.com> wrote:
>> Can we finally submit this patch, or is there something else I need to do here?
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>> From: Justin Lebar <jlebar@google.com>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:28:58 -0700
>>>>> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>>>>
>>>>> > Otherwise, the patch is OK Texinfo-wise; I don't know enough about
>>>>> > these issues to tell whether the content is correct
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought this indicated I should wait for someone else to chime in?
>>>>
>>>> You understood correctly. Since you are correcting existing
>>>> documentation, I think it would be good if someone who knows that
>>>> stuff looked at the corrections from the contents point of view and
>>>> approved them.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Content-wise, the patch is ok with me.
Hi.
fyi, I've committed this.