This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] rearrange struct value to save memory

On 01/14/2014 04:02 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I tried perf-check out on another branch today.  I didn't see a canned
> way to summarize the results, so I wrote the appended.  You'll need a
> newish version of prettytable if you don't want the colorizing to mess
> up the table.
> This is still pretty dumb... I didn't try to deal with graphing or
> anything cool like that.

Yeah, we don't have scripts of this kind to compare the perf results,
but I think we need some.

At present, I am running perf tests continuously, and feed the result
to codespeed, in which the performance is shown as some diagrams.  I
open them in web browser every day, to see if there are any perf
regressions.  codespeed doesn't meet our needs perfectly, so I am
only running it in house and don't propose using it for GDB.

Performance data collection has been done, but perf data record
and comparison is still missing.  I've had some thoughts, but
incomplete.  I'll assemble them for a post to see how much we
can do here.

Yao (éå)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]