This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Allow CLI and Python conditions to be set on same breakpoint
- From: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>, eliz at gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:21:51 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Allow CLI and Python conditions to be set on same breakpoint
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <m3siv0q29h dot fsf at seba dot sebabeach dot org> <m3k3gaq3gw dot fsf at seba dot sebabeach dot org> <87bo1mwvqg dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <52853D8A dot 5070908 at redhat dot com> <CAP9bCMRMZGrBgpToFp4RzA0f9TthKy8Kg9hqL_ENX=6B0yUdzg at mail dot gmail dot com> <8761rttr15 dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Tom Tromey <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Doug> Need More Data.
> That goes both ways.
> If you still prefer the other semantics, perhaps you could explain why.
I don't prefer the other semantics.
Composing || with separate breakpoints is easy enough, and it's harder
to compose && (*1).
"works for me"
I was considering && early on, but got off track. Oh well.
(*1): The rest of the discussion seemed to be trying to imply there
was something more than this simple sentence involved in the
explanation, and I was trying to understand what.