This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 6/10


On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:14, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2008 02:09:25, Michael Snyder wrote:
>
>> I do share your knee jerk reaction...
>>
>> Maybe I "let the cat out of the bag", because it appears
>> that the intended meaning of the macro was "are we recording",
>> but the implementation is "is this the process_record target".
>
> I already felt like this before regarding the RECORD_IS_USED macro,
> so it was not about the name change.
>
> Not sure if it's "are we recording" or are we "replaying", or
> a mix of both.  In any case, could each call site on the common
> code be replaced by a new suitable target method/property?

Could you give me more message on it? I am not very clear your mean.

Thanks,
Hui


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]