This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 6/10
On Thursday 20 November 2008 02:09:25, Michael Snyder wrote:
> I do share your knee jerk reaction...
> Maybe I "let the cat out of the bag", because it appears
> that the intended meaning of the macro was "are we recording",
> but the implementation is "is this the process_record target".
I already felt like this before regarding the RECORD_IS_USED macro,
so it was not about the name change.
Not sure if it's "are we recording" or are we "replaying", or
a mix of both. In any case, could each call site on the common
code be replaced by a new suitable target method/property?