This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/win32] Improve C-c handling when process in different console
- From: Nicolas Roche <roche at adacore dot com>
- To: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:06:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFA/win32] Improve C-c handling when process in different console
- References: <20081002225504.GF26384@adacore.com> <20081022164447.GB3638@adacore.com> <20081112163849.GA21312@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:38:50 -0500
Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:44:47AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >> 2008-10-02 Nicolas Roche <roche@adacore.com>
> >>
> >> * win32-nat.c (check_for_DebugBreakProcess): New function.
> >> (ctrl_c_handler): New function.
> >> (win32_wait): Register ctrl_c_handler as Ctrl-C handler if the inferior
> >> is run in a separate console.
> >> (_initialize_win32_nat): Check for DebugBreakProcess in kernel32.dll.
> >
> >Ping?
> >
> >http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-10/msg00070.html
>
> I'm very sorry that it has taken me so long to respond to this. Vacation and work
> have intervened.
No worries :-)
> I have an even older patch sitting in my inbox from Pierre Muller which, I think,
> attempts to address the same problem but seems to involve more code.
>
> One of the reasons that I have not responded sooner is that I have a patch in
> my sandbox which would surely conflict with this since it changes the mechanism
> used to determine the existence of newer functions like DebugBreak.
>
> So, anyway, I'll finish up my patch and adopt this change to it this weekend,
> checking in both.
Thanks a lot. It means implicitly that the patch is ok for you right ?
> Sorry for the delay. Please ping me again if you don't see this going in in
> the next week or so.
Won't hesitate
Nicolas