This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 0/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Introduction
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Pierre Muller <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- Cc: 'Sérgio Durigan Júnior' <sergiodj at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:48:12 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Introduction
- References: <1225773077.24532.51.camel@miki> <email@example.com>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:27:08AM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
> If my previous statement is wrong, you can skip
> what is following, otherwise my questions are:
> 1) Do all OS using syscalls use the same number to
> functionality correspondence?
> 2) Do all OS follow the "linux" habit of never changing the
> syscall numbers in changing versions?
Yes, as far as I know. This practice is much older than Linux.