This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygwin qt port- do I have to apply patches or something?
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:32:36 -0400
- Subject: Re: cygwin qt port- do I have to apply patches or something?
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4BB3F346.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 3/31/2010 9:54 PM, mike marchywka wrote:
On 3/31/10, Larry Hall (Cygwin)<reply-to-list-only-lh SYM cygwin SYM com> wrote:
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. No reason to feed the spammers.
On 3/31/2010 7:48 PM, mike marchywka wrote:
I went ahead and applied the patches and configure at least
seems to run. I just assumed the patch files were for reference,
shouldn't the source be patched when downloaded or is there
a reason for this ( or do I have a larger fundamental problem and
applying these patches just lets configure run longer)?
When patches are included you can assume:
1. The original pristine sources from upstream are included.
2. Any patches provided need to be applied to the pristine
source to get things building for Cygwin.
ok that's fine it seems to be building but I ran into the function pointer
problem that I mentioned in other build and none of the patches
apparently fixed it so I just changed it.
Of course, if there's a cygport script there, you shouldn't need to worry
about any of this. Just run it. See:
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple