This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?
- From: clayne at anodized dot com
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:28:08 -0700
- Subject: Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?
- References: <44A474CE.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20060630011818.GD2154@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <email@example.com>
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:42:00PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> "Christopher Faylor" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in
> >No. The mailing list descriptions really are accurate. If you don't
> >have a patch, then you shouldn't be sending email to cygwin-patches.
> Most cygwin development discussion occurs on the main list or on
And of course the discussion and methodology behind the internal
development of the cygwin libraries, issues, and future ideas is
- in true opensource form (NOT) - on a completely closed list,
invite-only, with no public access to any form of archives.
What exactly is the positive purpose behind that?
"cygwin-developers: a by-approval developers list for discussing
the internals of the Cygwin DLL and all components of the
"winsup" directory. Discussions of upcoming net releases are also
appropriate. Subscription requests are handled on a case-by-case
basis. Only subscribers may submit email to this list. Please do not
attempt to join the cygwin-developers mailing list unless 1) you are
thoroughly familiar with the cygwin DLL, 2) you have successfully built
the DLL from source, 3) you contributed at least one patch to the Cygwin
DLL or its utilities, and 4) you intend on being a long-term contributor.
Please do not ask for "read-only" access to this mailing list. You either
qualify or you don't. There is no middle ground."
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html