This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Skip ld/lto tests if plugins is disabled for binutils?

> From: Bin.Cheng <>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:28:32 +0200

> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
> <> wrote:
> >> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <>
> >> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:17:13 +0200
> >
> >> I'd rather fix up the broken pieces of "plugin support"
> >> (just there to pacify bfd's need) that actually *are* in sim
> >> already and look like they *should* pull in -ldl.  See
> >> sim/common/{,}; I'm looking into it.
> >
> > Looks like all that's actually needed is to regenerate
> > sim/*/configure, for example by means of "make autoconf-common"
> > in sim. Will do later; no keys here.
> Hi Hans-Peter,
> Any updates about this?  In the meantime, what else can I do except
> disable plugins/lto through out all toolchain components?  Since we
> use combined source tree and can't configure binutils and gdb
> differently.  Thanks very much.

Roland McGrath committed a re-build of sim/*/config{.in,ure}
later that day.  I'm guessing you haven't tried since then?
arm-eabi is fine in my autotester builds (using only --target
and --prefix options).

There are a couple of simulators suffering from fallout from the
regenerated due to older configury bugs
(e.g. iq2000-elf, frv-elf, m32r-elf and powerpc-eabisim needs
special treatment), but you didn't mention any others.

brgds, H-P

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]