This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Skip ld/lto tests if plugins is disabled for binutils?
- From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker dot cheng at gmail dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- Cc: amodra at gmail dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:28:32 +0800
- Subject: Re: Skip ld/lto tests if plugins is disabled for binutils?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <201408151517 dot s7FFHDkN000862 at ignucius dot se dot axis dot com> <201408151541 dot s7FFfLGE001637 at ignucius dot se dot axis dot com>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
<hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> wrote:
>> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
>> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:17:13 +0200
>
>> I'd rather fix up the broken pieces of "plugin support"
>> (just there to pacify bfd's need) that actually *are* in sim
>> already and look like they *should* pull in -ldl. See
>> sim/common/{configure.ac,Make-common.in}; I'm looking into it.
>
> Looks like all that's actually needed is to regenerate
> sim/*/configure, for example by means of "make autoconf-common"
> in sim. Will do later; no keys here.
Hi Hans-Peter,
Any updates about this? In the meantime, what else can I do except
disable plugins/lto through out all toolchain components? Since we
use combined source tree and can't configure binutils and gdb
differently. Thanks very much.
Thanks,
bin
>
> brgds, H-P