Meaningful parameters.

[Erik Jessen]

Making code more standardized, readable and maintanable is
*always* worth it.

Are you going to put some sort of a standard someplace in the
comments (so other people can follow it)?

Erik

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stanley Sutton" <sutton@t-surf.com>
To: <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: Meaningful parameters.


> Since I'm in actions.c, documenting, I'm trying to modify the parameter
> names to someting a little easier to follow while I'm changing things.
> 
> I'm pretty uniformly changing *unit to *actor, m to material, n to
> amount.  After that, things are a bit less uniform.  It's wordier (more
> wordy?), but I think it reads a little better.  Of course, it means
> backtracking and changing things I've already documented, and changing a
> fair amount of code, but it's probably worth the effort.
> 
>