JConq

[lduperval@microcelli5.com]

On  7 Feb, Hans Ronne wrote:
> So if you want to port xconq to java, I would encourage you to give it a
> try. I doubt the result would be much better than existing versions, but I
> could be wrong, and the proof is in the pudding. However, changing the grid
> seems to me like an unnecessary complication. It is not this part of xconq
> that needs to be fixed, it is the network code.
> 

So what exactlky *is* the problem with the net code. Is it the code itself?
Is it the design? Is it something else? Is it so incomprehensible that it
should be rewritten from scratch?

L

-- 
Laurent Duperval <mailto:lduperval@microcelli5.com>

Nous allons rire au nez du destin sournois!
                                             -Alambic Talon