[Bug translator/10830] new pp() variant for source-level probe point name

[fche at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2010-06-23 11:42 -------
I'm not too keen on verbosifying the function names, nor
deprecating one of the most used tapset functions (pp()).

One other possibility is to permit and use tapset function
overloading:  pp()==pp(0)    pp1 to become pp(1).  This would
also be useful for PR11679.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10830

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.