Recent test results

[William Cohen]

Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
> Martin,
> 	Can you mail your fix so I can verify the same on my Ia64 box.

It is already checked into the cvs, so you should be able to do an "cvs 
update -d -P" to get it.

-Will

> 
> -thanks,
> Anil 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org 
>>[mailto:systemtap-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Martin Hunt
>>Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 12:36 PM
>>To: William Cohen
>>Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
>>Subject: Re: Recent test results
>>
>>On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:35 -0500, William Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>Tried out testing a current snapshot of systemtap (20051111) on some
>>>systems.
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>Looking into why some of the x86_64 tests start failing when all are
>>>run. It looks like it is failing in the same way as the ia64 tests
>>>that Anil ran earlier in the week; things go wrong with simple.exp.
>>>Also noticed that x86_64 version failed to report the systemtap
>>>version.
>>
>>I got the same results as you.
>>
>>I'm certainly not an expect expert, but a quick look at stap_run.exp
>>shows a major flaw. I made a quick fix and now I get:
>>
>>Running ./systemtap.samples/syscalls2.exp ...
>>Running ./systemtap.samples/sysopen.exp ...
>>Running ./systemtap.samples/transport.exp ...
>>
>>               === systemtap Summary ===
>>
>># of expected passes            107
>>
>>kernel version: 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp
>>systemtap translator version: version 0.4.2 built 2005-11-11
>>
>>
>>
>>