CVS corruption?
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Mon Mar 5 10:01:00 GMT 2001
In message < 20010302101135.A22602@shell17.ba.best.com >you write:
> It's been truncated. I only looked it over briefly, but it looks
> like revisions 1.1.1.5 - 1.1.1.9 have been lost. The 1.1.1.x series
> were gcc2 imports that Jeff Law was doing back in 1999. Only cvs
> commands that parse the entire file, such as cvs annotate or cvs
> log, will notice the problem.
On a positive note, I happen to have (via cvsup which hasn't run in a while)
a copy of that file that hasn't been corrupted. I can use it to recreate
the goof'd stuff.
> Be sure to verify that the 1.1.1.5-9 revisions are the only ones that
> have been lost. I only did a brief inspection.
How did you do this? I don't mind grubbing through it, but without some
clue what to look for it might be tough given the size of the ChangeLog,v
file :-)
> I can't guess why this file was truncated. The file at Yahoo which
> were truncated had all been truncated long before I got there, and
> given the state of the cvs server when I arrived, I'd suspect that
> the repository disk filled up. Obviously the repository disk on
> sourceware hasn't filled up, and I don't remember disk space ever
> being an issue on the CVS partition on the previous sourceware
> hardware.
There's been bugs in CVS before which would exhibit similar behavior, but
I thought they were fixed long ago.
jeff
More information about the Overseers
mailing list