[PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects

[Freddie Chopin]

On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 10:42 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 30/01/17 10:09, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 07:55 +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> > > > Alternatively I could do "__<name>_[non]recursive_lock" and
> > > > this
> > > > would
> > > > not conflict with any function name, but it's not really better
> > > > than
> > > > the "object" suffix.
> > 
> > Another option: "__<name>_[recursive_]mutex".
> 
> Yes, this is what I was about to suggest, but you were faster.

OK then, if no one objects, I'll change, test and resend the patch(es)
in the evening.

Regards,
FCh