NULL definition
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Thu Nov 1 15:56:00 GMT 2012
Hi,
while working on something completely different, I stumbled over the
definition of NULL in newlib.
Throughout newlib, NULL is defined like this:
#ifndef NULL
#define NULL 0
#endif
The problem with this definition is that it's not quite wrong, but
also not really correct, according to POSIX.1-2008:
The <stddef.h> header shall define the following macros:
NULL
Null pointer constant. ^[CX] [Option Start] The macro shall
expand to an integer constant expression with the value 0 cast
to type void *. [Option End]
Even if you ignore the optional part, the important snippet here is
that NULL expands to a Null *pointer* value. However, our definition
of NULL is just 0, so it is of type int. But on many targets
sizeof(int) is != sizeof(void*). This could potentially result in size
problems.
So, given that we already rely on stddef.h anyway throughout our header
files, I wonder if we shouldn't change the definition of NULL by
including stddef.h as well, so we always get it right:
#define __need_NULL
#include <stddef.h>
Any problems with that?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat
More information about the Newlib
mailing list