M_LOG2_E vs. M_LN2 cleanup patch

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Dec  3 10:22, Howland Craig D (Craig) wrote:
> Corinna:
>      Yes, that would be better.  (It's in there way too many times, and
> I
> missed line 532.)  Adjusted patch to do that attached.
>      (By the way, there is no practical difference in the values, beause
> double does not have enough precision to get there.  Intel 80-bit long
> double probably would not notice, either.  But is is best to define it
> once only, as you suggest.)
>      Thanks for the sharp eyes.
> 				Craig

Thanks, applied.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat