M_LOG2_E vs. M_LN2 cleanup patch
Fri Dec 3 20:40:00 GMT 2010
On Dec 3 10:22, Howland Craig D (Craig) wrote:
> Yes, that would be better. (It's in there way too many times, and
> missed line 532.) Adjusted patch to do that attached.
> (By the way, there is no practical difference in the values, beause
> double does not have enough precision to get there. Intel 80-bit long
> double probably would not notice, either. But is is best to define it
> once only, as you suggest.)
> Thanks for the sharp eyes.
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
More information about the Newlib